Four Student Witnesses Challenge Anthony’s Self-Defense Claim in Court

Witness Number Three Challenges the Timeline

The third student witness focused on timing.

During testimony, this witness described specific actions occurring in rapid succession.

The prosecution used these observations to construct a detailed timeline.

According to the witness:

1. A verbal dispute occurred.
2. Tension increased.
3. A physical encounter followed.
4. Anthony’s actions appeared to come before any visible attack.

This sequence was important because it directly contradicted the defense’s assertion that Anthony reacted to an immediate threat.

Defense attorneys questioned the witness carefully.

They explored whether memory could have become less accurate over time.

The witness acknowledged that memories can fade but insisted the core events remained clear